Header bg
  • Users Online: 493
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Header bg
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 1  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 70-72

Case series: deep sedation for paedatric patients with pericardial effusion

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia Jakarta, Indonesia

Correspondence Address:
Ratna Farida Soenarto
Ratna Farida Soenarto, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jl. Salemba Raya 6, Jakarta 10430
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.15562/bjoa.v1i3.33

Rights and Permissions

Background: Pericardial effusion is an abnormal fluid accumulation in the pericardial space that potentially compromises cardiovascular function, thus it needs a prompt treatment. Pericardial effusion evacuation in paediatrics can be done by subxyphoid pericardiotomy, which requires patient's cooperation. General anaesthesia for paediatrics with pericardial effusion has been reported unfavourable. This case series reports safe anaesthesia procedures done for pericardiocentesis through both sedation and general anaesthesia. Case Presentations: Cases were taken from Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia. 6 patients underwent sedation and 3 patients underwent general anaesthesia. Both groups used ketamine, midazolam and fentanyl. Sevoflurane was used as inhalation agent for maintenance. Blood pressure, heart rate, and SpO2 were recorded before and after pericardiocentesis. In both groups, there were no significant different between systolic and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, and SpO2 before and after the procedure (p=0.05). Immobilization through sedation or general anaesthesia is required to perform an optimal pericardiotomy. Anaesthetic agents were chosen based on their minimal effects toward myocardial depression. Fluids balance before and after the procedure was crucial to prevent hemodynamic instability during effusion evacuation. Conclusion: Both sedation and general anaesthesia were safe for pericardiocentesis, with concern toward anaesthetic agents that were minimally depressive to myocardium, combined with opioid analgesics and other sedative agents, with balanced anaesthesia principle. Optimal intravenous fluid therapy with echocardiography monitoring is crucial. Sedation is more advantageous for patients requiring pericardiocentesis without preoperative preparation for general anaesthesia.

Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded89    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal